What We Do
TechFreedom digs deep into the hard policy and legal questions raised by technological change. We’re bullish on the future: for the most part, it’ll be great — if we let it. If those in power can resist the all-too-natural impulse for stability and control. We craft policy frameworks that allow for experimentation, innovation, and evolution, that help people adapt to change, instead of trying to fight it, that focus on clear problems. In short, we teach policymakers how to be friends, not enemies, of the future.
The future will be as grand, and as particular, as we are.
Recent Posts
“Breaking Down” the FCC’s Assembly Line Model for Satellite Licensing
Yesterday, TechFreedom published a new paper exploring the developing conflict between the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) desire to create an “assembly line” for processing satellite...
AI Outputs Are Protected by the First Amendment, TechFreedom Explains in New Paper
Today, TechFreedom published a new paper, “AI + 1A: Why the First Amendment Protects Artificial Intelligence,” by Corbin K. Barthold, the organization’s Internet Policy Counsel....
FCC Threats Against Broadcasters Violate the First Amendment
Today, TechFreedom was joined by 80+ scholars of the First Amendment, communications, and technology law, veterans of the Federal Communications Commission, and civil society organizations...
Event: The Culture War, FTC Investigations & the First Amendment
Before he was appointed Federal Trade Commission Chair, Andrew Ferguson promised he would “Fight Wokeness.” He said he would “Hold Big Tech Accountable and Stop...
For Innovative Space Activities, Mission Authorization Is the Right Model, but Congress Must Act
Today, TechFreedom submitted comments to the Department of Commerce’s Office of Commercial Space (OSC) on its framework to establish a “Mission Authorization” regulatory regime for...
FTC’s AI Policy Statement No Substitute for Rulemaking
Today, TechFreedom released an open letter calling on the FTC to take public comments before finalizing its policy statement on deceptive AI and federal preemption....