Free market proponents, such as TechFreedom, the Free State Foundation, and Cato Institute, which filed an amicus brief in [Verizon v. FCC], take issue with the need for the regulation in the first place because there is nothing to regulate.
“The government identifies no compelling interest. The evidence simply does not show discriminatory practices requiring new regulatory remedies,” the brief said. “To the extent broadband providers abuse market power to block access to competitors, rather than infringe on providers’ editorial discretion, such actions can be addressed through existing antitrust law.”
Read the full article here, and see what else we’ve done on the FCC’s Open Internet Order.