Yesterday, TechFreedom filed comments in response to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NRPM) regarding Spectrum Abundance for Weird Space Stuff. TechFreedom supports the Commission’s efforts to provide much-needed spectrum for innovative space enterprises and commends its disciplined approach.
“The NPRM recognizes the magnitude of the problem and importance of this proceeding,” said James E. Dunstan, TechFreedom’s Senior Counsel. “Thirty years ago, Congress granted the FCC auction authority that defined the highest and best use of spectrum as how much someone was willing to pay the government, resulting in the reallocation and auction of substantial spectrum to terrestrial wireless services. Today, the exponentially growing need for commercial spectrum for space operations—not telecommunications services—is threatening to delay or destroy America’s commercial space industry.”
“The FCC is a spectrum agency, not a space operations agency,” continued Dunstan. “Just four years ago, the previous FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry as a first step in regulating in-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (ISAM). Yet the focus of that proceeding was on regulating space operations, not providing spectrum for ISAM. That approach exceeded the Commission’s statutory authority. In a Goldilocks moment, the present NPRM is just right. The emphasis is on finding spectrum to fuel America’s breakout onto the High Frontier, not seeking to devise rules for rendezvous proximity operations (RPO). As the Eighth Circuit recently found in striking down the prior FCC’s digital discrimination framework, in a post-Loper Bright world, agencies are not free to interpret their statutory authority as they see fit.”
“The NPRM proposes some short-term fixes that might provide sufficient spectrum for the next few years,” Dunstan concluded. “But more than figuring out how to tinker with a few MHz here and there, the Commission should be bold—establishing a new space telemetry and telecommand service (STTS) and allocating to it specific spectrum for space operators who are not also providing a telecommunications service. Further, working with NTIA, we must rethink how space spectrum can be allocated to best lead us forward, as America quickly transitions from a space-by-government to a space-by-government and commercial partner model of operations.”
###
Find these comments on our website, and share them on Twitter and Bluesky. We can be reached for comment at media@techfreedom.org. Read our related work, including:
- When the Assembly Line Breaks Down: Reassessing FCC Licensing of Next-Generation Satellite Systems (Apr. 8, 2026)
- Comments to the Office of Commercial Space (OSC) on its framework to establish a “Mission Authorization” regulatory regime for innovative space activities (Mar. 13, 2026)
- Comments on the NPRM to modernize the FCC’s space and earth station licensing process (Jan. 20, 2026)
- Comments to the European Commission regarding the EU’s Draft Space Act (Nov. 7, 2025)
- Comments to the Dept of Commerce on the Draft EU Space Act (Aug. 15, 2025)
- We need a National Space Council to chart our future in outer space, SpaceNews (Jan. 23, 2025)
- Comments on the mitigation of orbital debris in the new space age, (June 27, 2024)
- Comments on NASA’s Lunar Non-Interference Questionnaire, (June 7, 2024)
- Comments to the FCC on In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (ISAM) (Apr. 29, 2024)
- Do We Still Have the Right Stuff?, City Journal (Dec. 2023)
- SpaceX Makes Progress on Second Test of Starship, Reason (Nov. 18, 2023)
- Tech Policy Podcast #349: The State of Space Exploration (July 25, 2023)
- Regulating the space economy is vital for America’s continued global leadership, Washington Examiner (July 15, 2023)
- Written testimony before the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on U.S. leadership in commercial space (July 13, 2023)
About TechFreedom: TechFreedom is a nonprofit, nonpartisan technology policy think tank. We work to chart a path forward for policymakers towards a bright future where technology enhances freedom, and freedom enhances technology.
